Stephen Durrant

475 citations
39 papers · 265 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Durrant

22 papers receiving 142 citations

Peers

Stephen Durrant
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cultural Studies 83
  • Anthropology 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 199
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Religious studies 11
Replace Jean Jamin with:
Jean Jamin France
Paul Rouzer United States
Michel Tournier
Joan Dayan United States
John T. Irwin United Kingdom
Michel Leiris Germany
Lizabeth Paravisini-Gebert United States
Andrew H. Plaks United States
Robert L. Belknap United States
Judith Wilt United States
Stephen Durrant relative to Jean Jamin France Jean Jamin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jean Jamin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Durrant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Durrant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Durrant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Durrant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Durrant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Durrant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Durrant. The network helps show where Stephen Durrant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Durrant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Durrant Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Durrant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987135
2
Early China, ancient Greece : thinking through comparisons
200226
3 199723
4 199618
5 200014
6 19897
7
The tale of the Nišan shamaness: A Manchu folk epic
19776
8 19795
9 19864
10 19814
11 19793
12 19883
13 19772
14 19922
15 19922
16 19892
17
The ExoMars Sample Preparation and Distribution System
20121
18 20161
19 19801
20 19911

About Stephen Durrant

Stephen Durrant is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 39 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (21 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (3 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (83 citations), Anthropology (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (199 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations) and Religious studies (11 citations). Stephen Durrant has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin A. Elman, Michael Puett, Yiqun Zhou, Timothy Light, Wai-yee Li, Burton Watson, Michael Nylan, Philip F. Williams, L. Richter and Peter Hofmann. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, Monumenta Serica, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Early China and Signs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact