Benedict Williams
Impact in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Papers in
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 2
- Digital Games and Media 1
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Jason Skues (3 shared papers)Lisa Wise (4 shared papers)Richard Moulding (1 shared paper)Anna Thomas (1 shared paper)Glen Bates (1 shared paper)Catherine Wood (1 shared paper)Susan J. Paxton (1 shared paper)Jennifer Boldero (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (1 paper)Psychiatry Psychology and Law (1 paper)Asian Journal Of Social Psychology (1 paper)Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology) (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Benedict Williams
8 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Applied Psychology 14
- Clinical Psychology 47
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Education 59
- Communication 14
Countries citing papers authored by Benedict Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Benedict Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedict Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedict Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benedict Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedict Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedict Williams. The network helps show where Benedict Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Benedict Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 |
About Benedict Williams
Benedict Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Innovations in Educational Methods (1 paper) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (47 citations), Sociology and Political Science (99 citations), Education (59 citations) and Communication (14 citations). Benedict Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jason Skues, Lisa Wise, Richard Moulding, Anna Thomas, Glen Bates, Catherine Wood, Susan J. Paxton, Jennifer Boldero, Anne Hampton and Jill Francis. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Asian Journal Of Social Psychology and Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.