Benedict Williams

986 citations
12 papers · 175 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Benedict Williams

9 papers receiving 160 citations

Peers

Benedict Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Clinical Psychology 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
  • Education 65
  • Communication 14
Replace Anthony M. Bean with:
Anthony M. Bean United States
Lavinia McLean United Kingdom
Shuhong Lin China
Ahmet Gül Türkiye
Yu-Tai Wu Taiwan
Jia Yuin Fam Malaysia
Biljana Gjoneska North Macedonia
Paul E. Weigle United States
Sofia Mastrokoukou Italy
Grazia De Angelis Italy
Benedict Williams relative to Anthony M. Bean United States Anthony M. Bean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Anthony M. Bean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benedict Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benedict Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedict Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedict Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benedict Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedict Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedict Williams. The network helps show where Benedict Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Benedict Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benedict Williams Line = papers co-authored together Benedict Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201869
2 201167
3 201121
4 20077
5 20095
6 20112
7 20132
8 20151
9 20221
10 20240
11 20240
12 20240

About Benedict Williams

Benedict Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Innovations in Educational Methods (1 paper) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (48 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations), Education (65 citations) and Communication (14 citations). Benedict Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jason Skues, Lisa Wise, Richard Moulding, Anna Thomas, Catherine Wood, Glen Bates, Susan J. Paxton, Birgit Loch, Theodor Wyeld and Jennifer Boldero. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Asian Journal Of Social Psychology and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact