Asian Journal Of Social Psychology

815 papers and 17.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 815 papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (553 papers), Sociology and Political Science (452 papers) and Clinical Psychology (127 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Differences and Values (346 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (286 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology are Albert Bandura, Kwang‐Kuo Hwang, Rth Ho, SM Ng, David Matsumoto, Carter T. Butts, Kuo‐Shu Yang, Toshio Yamagishi, Kuang‐Hui Yeh and Michael Harris Bond.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Journal Of Social Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Journal Of Social Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025