Ben Freyens

45 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Ben Freyens
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Public Administration 42
  • Media Technology 57
  • Strategy and Management 68
  • Economics and Econometrics 82
  • Management Science and Operations Research 33
Replace Ani Matei with:
Ani Matei Romania
Silvia Iacuzzi Italy
Michael E. Milakovich United States
David Špaček Czechia
James D. McNiven Canada
Dónal Palcic Ireland
Ali Pirannejad Iran
Jean‐Patrick Villeneuve Switzerland
Zachary Spicer Canada
John O’Looney United States
Ben Freyens relative to Ani Matei Romania Ani Matei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Ani Matei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Freyens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Freyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Freyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Freyens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Freyens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Freyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Freyens. The network helps show where Ben Freyens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ben Freyens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Freyens Line = papers co-authored together Ben Freyens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Policy in Action: The Challenge of Service Delivery
200938
2 200930
3 201230
4 201729
5 201616
6 201112
7 200712
8 201012
9 201110
10 201110
11 20099
12 20108
13 20078
14 20167
15 20177
16
A first look at incidence and outcomes of unfair dismissal claims under Fair Work, Work Choices and the Workplace Relations Act
20136
17 20066
18 20116
19 20166
20 20236

About Ben Freyens

Ben Freyens is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Media Technology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 51 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ICT Impact and Policies (12 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (10 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (7 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (42 citations), Media Technology (57 citations), Strategy and Management (68 citations), Economics and Econometrics (82 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (33 citations). Ben Freyens has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include John Butcher, John Wanna, Robert Ackland, Steve Dowrick, Hitomi Nakanishi, Deborah Blackman, Huong Dinh, Oleg Yerokhin, Xiaodong Gong and Angela M. Benson. Their work appears in journals such as Telecommunications Policy, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Journal of Public Economic Theory, Information Economics and Policy and Australian Journal of Public Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact