Beatrice Lee

1.3k citations
82 papers · 816 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Beatrice Lee

76 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

Beatrice Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Clinical Psychology 342
  • Applied Psychology 73
  • Safety Research 90
  • Social Psychology 159
  • General Health Professions 121
Replace Jialing Wu with:
Jialing Wu China
Silvia Bonino Italy
Marian McLaughlin United Kingdom
Kathleen Meyers United States
Pia Zeinoun Lebanon
Terry Ng‐Knight United Kingdom
Susan Decker United States
Noud Frielink Netherlands
Julian Beezhold United Kingdom
Ana Navarro United States
Beatrice Lee relative to Jialing Wu China Jialing Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jialing Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beatrice Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beatrice Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beatrice Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beatrice Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beatrice Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beatrice Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beatrice Lee. The network helps show where Beatrice Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beatrice Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beatrice Lee Line = papers co-authored together Beatrice Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020205
2 202142
3 202041
4 201832
5 202031
6 202022
7 201721
8 201821
9 201821
10 202120
11 202113
12 202213
13 202013
14 202212
15 201812
16 202012
17 202112
18 202212
19 201911
20 201411

About Beatrice Lee

Beatrice Lee is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (20 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (11 papers), Disability Education and Employment (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (8 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (5 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (342 citations), Applied Psychology (73 citations), Safety Research (90 citations), Social Psychology (159 citations) and General Health Professions (121 citations). Beatrice Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Emre Umucu, Jessica Brooks, Timothy N. Tansey, Fong Chan, Kanako Iwanaga, Jia-Rung Wu, Xiangli Chen, Fong Chan, Hyejin Jung and Karen L. Fortuna. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Rehabilitation Psychology, Frontiers in Public Health and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact