Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

1.2k papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin usually cover Safety Research (302 papers), Social Psychology (244 papers) and Clinical Psychology (216 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (263 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (175 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin are Hanoch Livneh, Richard T. Roessler, Michael J. Leahy, David R. Strauser, Ellen S. Fabian, Donald C. Linkowski, Malachy Bishop, Nan Zhang Hampton, Daniel C. Lustig and John F. Kosciulek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025