B.B. Teter

1.7k citations
27 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

B.B. Teter

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

B.B. Teter
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 978
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 826
  • Biochemistry 288
  • Animal Science and Zoology 235
  • Genetics 334
Replace Liliana S. Piperova with:
Liliana S. Piperova United States
Donald L. Palmquist United States
Asgeir Sæbø United States
Y. Chilliard France
P. Secchiari Italy
T. W. Scott Australia
Marius Collomb Switzerland
Fergal Lawless Ireland
Thomas C. Jenkins United States
J. E. Storry United States
B.B. Teter relative to Liliana S. Piperova United States Liliana S. Piperova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Liliana S. Piperova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B.B. Teter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.B. Teter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.B. Teter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.B. Teter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.B. Teter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.B. Teter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.B. Teter. The network helps show where B.B. Teter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B.B. Teter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B.B. Teter Line = papers co-authored together B.B. Teter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000236
2 2002225
3 1997214
4 1997122
5 199494
6 199583
7 200457
8
Open- and closed-formula laboratory animal diets and their importance to research.
200956
9 199650
10 199041
11 201041
12 200026
13 201722
14 201319
15 201316
16 201216
17 201216
18 201410
19 201410
20 20099

About B.B. Teter

B.B. Teter is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (19 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (14 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (10 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (978 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (826 citations), Biochemistry (288 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (235 citations) and Genetics (334 citations). B.B. Teter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include R.A. Erdman, Liliana S. Piperova, J. Sampugna, K. F. Kalscheur, M. P. Yurawecz, Kim M. Morehouse, A.V. Capuco, D.R. Waldo, Pryce Gaynor and I. Bruckental. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Nutrition, Ophthalmic Research, Journal of the American College of Nutrition and Lipids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact