Bart de Smit

407 citations
26 papers · 191 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Bart de Smit

25 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers

Bart de Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Geometry and Topology 161
  • Algebra and Number Theory 62
  • Mathematical Physics 113
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 25
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
Replace Claudio Pedrini with:
Claudio Pedrini Italy
Olivier Wittenberg France
Deirdre Haskell Canada
Jón Kr. Arason Iceland
Klaas Pieter Hart Netherlands
Jochen Koenigsmann Germany
Ja Kyung Koo South Korea
Sinnou David France
Per Salberger Sweden
Andreas Baudisch Germany
Bart de Smit relative to Claudio Pedrini Italy Claudio Pedrini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Claudio Pedrini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bart de Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bart de Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart de Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart de Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bart de Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart de Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart de Smit. The network helps show where Bart de Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Bart de Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bart de Smit Line = papers co-authored together Bart de Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199741
2 200021
3 199220
4 199417
5 199710
6 20078
7 20077
8 20007
9 19976
10 20086
11 20106
12 20016
13 20026
14 20014
15 19974
16 20184
17 20134
18 20113
19 19983
20 20032

About Bart de Smit

Bart de Smit is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (15 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (4 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (3 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (3 papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (161 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (62 citations), Mathematical Physics (113 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (25 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Bart de Smit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Lenstra, Wieb Bosma, René Schoof, Karl Rubin, Gunther Cornelissen, Xin Li, Matilde Marcolli, Mark McClure, Stan Wagon and Willem Jan Palenstijn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Acta Arithmetica, Journal of Differential Geometry, Mathematical Research Letters and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact