Barbara Sarter

17 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Barbara Sarter
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Research and Theory 28
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • General Health Professions 106
  • General Psychology 5
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 61
Replace Sarah C. Hunter with:
Sarah C. Hunter Australia
Ahmad Nasiri Iran
İnsaf Altun Türkiye
Mohammad Aghajani Iran
Raeann LeBlanc United States
Krystyna Kowalczuk Poland
Faranak Jafari Iran
Jeonghyun Kim South Korea
Bochen Pan China
Annie L. Nguyen United States
Barbara Sarter relative to Sarah C. Hunter Australia Sarah C. Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Sarah C. Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Sarter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Sarter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Sarter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Sarter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Sarter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Sarter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Sarter. The network helps show where Barbara Sarter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Sarter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Sarter Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Sarter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Paths to knowledge: innovative research methods for nursing.
1988147
2 200286
3 201472
4 200567
5
Love and work: oncology nurses' view of the meaning of their work.
199343
6 198840
7 201027
8 201423
9 198717
10 201415
11
The stream of becoming: a study of Martha Rogers's theory.
19879
12 19896
13 20216
14
Brief case reports of medically supervised, water-only fasting associated with remission of autoimmune disease.
20025
15 20143
16 20122
17
Breast cancer prevention with grape seed phytochemicals
20051

About Barbara Sarter

Barbara Sarter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (2 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (1 paper), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (1 paper) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (28 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations), General Health Professions (106 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (61 citations). Barbara Sarter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kristine Kelsey, William S. Harris, Todd A. Schwartz, Peter W. Laird, Tiffany I. Long, Mimi C. Yu, Woon‐Puay Koh, Dale Glaser, Iris R. Bell and John A. Ives. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Science Quarterly, Global Advances in Health and Medicine, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Clinical Nutrition and Advances in Nursing Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact