Bao‐Hui Cheng

1.0k citations
41 papers · 759 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Bao‐Hui Cheng

38 papers receiving 755 citations

Peers

Bao‐Hui Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 37
  • Biochemistry 66
  • Biotechnology 67
  • Pharmacology 105
  • Pharmacology 50
Replace Hyelin Jeon with:
Hyelin Jeon South Korea
Ke-Wang Luo China
M. Waheed Roomi United States
Jianxin Chen China
Chong Kook Kim South Korea
Sabeeha Ali India
Nam–Hui Yim South Korea
Jae In Jung South Korea
Chung Ho Ryu South Korea
Li-Shu Wang United States
Bao‐Hui Cheng relative to Hyelin Jeon South Korea Hyelin Jeon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Hyelin Jeon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bao‐Hui Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bao‐Hui Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bao‐Hui Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bao‐Hui Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bao‐Hui Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bao‐Hui Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bao‐Hui Cheng. The network helps show where Bao‐Hui Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bao‐Hui Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bao‐Hui Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Bao‐Hui Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016115
2 201895
3 202057
4 201349
5 202244
6 201834
7 202429
8 201927
9 201826
10 201725
11 201925
12 201119
13 202419
14 201718
15 202217
16 201816
17 201914
18 201514
19 201910
20 202410

About Bao‐Hui Cheng

Bao‐Hui Cheng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Immunology, Biotechnology and Plant Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Inflammasome and immune disorders (4 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (3 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (3 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (3 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (37 citations), Biochemistry (66 citations), Biotechnology (67 citations), Pharmacology (105 citations) and Pharmacology (50 citations). Bao‐Hui Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ke-Wang Luo, Tianyong Hu, Hanchao Gao, Weiren Huang, Wei Chen, Zhiming Cai, Li Ma, Zhiqiang Liu, Wei‐Hua Jiao and Hou‐Wen Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Journal of Natural Products, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Journal of Inflammation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact