B. Mitchell Peck

29 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

B. Mitchell Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • General Health Professions 259
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 112
  • Speech and Hearing 45
  • Pharmacy 30
  • Clinical Psychology 111
Replace Linda Murray with:
Linda Murray Australia
Maria Skyvell Nilsson Sweden
Nicola Small United Kingdom
Edel Doherty Ireland
Peter Nowak Austria
Arthur G. Cosby United States
Jennifer S. Carrera United States
Simon Coulombe Canada
Wansoo Im United States
Chris Naylor United Kingdom
B. Mitchell Peck relative to Linda Murray Australia Linda Murray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Linda Murray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Mitchell Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Mitchell Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Mitchell Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Mitchell Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Mitchell Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Mitchell Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Mitchell Peck. The network helps show where B. Mitchell Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Mitchell Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Mitchell Peck Line = papers co-authored together B. Mitchell Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004170
2 199789
3 200472
4 201171
5 201253
6 200145
7 200439
8 199430
9 201227
10 201021
11 201221
12
Lifestyle discussions during doctor-older patient interactions: the role of time in the medical encounter.
200720
13 199520
14 200719
15 201116
16 201915
17 201911
18 20197
19 19945
20 20005

About B. Mitchell Peck

B. Mitchell Peck is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Stoma care and complications (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (259 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (112 citations), Speech and Hearing (45 citations), Pharmacy (30 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). B. Mitchell Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Samuel D. Brody, Wesley E. Highfield, Howard B. Kaplan, Diane S. Kaplan, Susan F. Sharp, James A. Tulsky, Debra Roter, David A. Asch, Susan Dorr Goold and Peter A. Ubel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Educational Research, Child Care Health and Development, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Healthcare Management and Armed Forces & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact