John Frow
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 7
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Tom Bennett (2 shared papers)Meaghan Morris (2 shared papers)Tony Bennett (6 shared papers)B. McH. (1 shared paper)Michael Sprinker (1 shared paper)Michael Emmison (1 shared paper)Ghassan Hage (1 shared paper)Greg Noble (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cultural Studies (3 papers)Social Semiotics (3 papers)New Literary History (3 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Comparative Literature (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
John Frow
78 papers receiving 965 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Urban Studies 195
- Literature and Literary Theory 335
- Music 91
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 117
- Museology 59
Countries citing papers authored by John Frow
This map shows the geographic impact of John Frow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Frow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frow. The network helps show where John Frow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside John Frow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures | 1999 | 206 |
| 2 | 1997 | 120 | |
| 3 | Time and commodity culture : essays in cultural theory and postmodernity | 1997 | 110 |
| 4 | Australian cultural studies : a reader | 1993 | 103 |
| 5 | 1991 | 102 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 56 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 33 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 22 | |
| 19 | The New Literary Middlebrow: Tastemakers and Reading in the Twenty-First Century | 2014 | 20 |
| 20 | 1985 | 19 |
About John Frow
John Frow is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (7 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (3 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (195 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (335 citations), Music (91 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (117 citations) and Museology (59 citations). John Frow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Tom Bennett, Meaghan Morris, Tony Bennett, B. McH., Michael Sprinker, Michael Emmison, Ghassan Hage, Greg Noble, Vanessa Smith and F. W. Galan. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Studies, Social Semiotics, New Literary History, The Modern Language Review and Comparative Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.