John Frow
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
- Music top 2%
- Music History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 5
- Australian History and Society 5
- Digital Games and Media 3
-
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 6
- Co-authors
- Tom Bennett (1 shared paper)Meaghan Morris (2 shared papers)Tony Bennett (4 shared papers)B. McH. (1 shared paper)Michael Emmison (1 shared paper)Michael Sprinker (1 shared paper)Vanessa Smith (1 shared paper)Ghassan Hage (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
John Frow
66 papers receiving 853 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Urban Studies 178
- Music 85
- Literature and Literary Theory 259
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 94
- Museology 47
Countries citing papers authored by John Frow
This map shows the geographic impact of John Frow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Frow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Frow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Frow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Frow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Frow. The network helps show where John Frow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Frow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures | 1999 | 185 |
| 2 | 1997 | 102 | |
| 3 | Time and commodity culture : essays in cultural theory and postmodernity | 1997 | 94 |
| 4 | 1991 | 94 | |
| 5 | Australian cultural studies : a reader | 1993 | 90 |
| 6 | 1988 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 21 | |
| 17 | Information technology as cultural capital | 1998 | 20 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 19 | The New Literary Middlebrow: Tastemakers and Reading in the Twenty-First Century | 2014 | 19 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19 |
About John Frow
John Frow is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Narrative Theory and Analysis (6 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Australian History and Society (5 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (3 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (178 citations), Music (85 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (259 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (94 citations) and Museology (47 citations). John Frow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Tom Bennett, Meaghan Morris, Tony Bennett, B. McH., Michael Emmison, Michael Sprinker, Vanessa Smith, Ghassan Hage, Greg Noble and James Phelan. Their work appears in journals such as Social Semiotics, New Literary History, Cultural Studies, Journal of sociology and Poetics Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.