John S. Nelson

43 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

John S. Nelson
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Philosophy 191
  • Literature and Literary Theory 143
  • Communication 79
  • General Psychology 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
Replace Allan Megill with:
Allan Megill United States
A. R. Louch United States
Julius Sensat United States
W. Ross Winterowd United States
David R. Shumway United States
Janet M. Atwill United States
Richard L. Johannesen United States
Wayne E. Brockriede United States
Michael A. Overington Canada
Ellen Messer‐Davidow India
John S. Nelson relative to Allan Megill United States Allan Megill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Allan Megill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John S. Nelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Nelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Nelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Nelson. The network helps show where John S. Nelson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John S. Nelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John S. Nelson Line = papers co-authored together John S. Nelson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989265
2 198867
3 199337
4 198535
5 198630
6
Video Rhetorics: Televised Advertising in American Politics
199720
7 19789
8
Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs
19897
9 19757
10
Tradition, interpretation, and science : political theory in the American academy
19864
11 20054
12 20034
13 19844
14 20034
15 19804
16
Conspiracy as a Hollywood Trope for System
20033
17 19803
18 19753
19 19853
20 19913

About John S. Nelson

John S. Nelson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 54 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (9 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers), Political Science Research and Education (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (191 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (143 citations), Communication (79 citations), General Psychology (14 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations). John S. Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include A. R. Louch, Allan Megill, Michael McGee, Donald N. McCloskey, G. R. Boynton, Linda Brodkey, George L. Dillon, B. McH., Margaret G. Hermann and Deirdre N. McCloskey. Their work appears in journals such as Political Communication, The Journal of Politics, History and Theory, Accounting Organizations and Society and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact