B. Jelles

856 citations
11 papers · 656 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

B. Jelles

11 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

B. Jelles
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 446
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 153
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 70
  • Signal Processing 37
Replace R.W.M. Keunen with:
R.W.M. Keunen Netherlands
T. Inouye Japan
Klaus Hahn Germany
H. Pockberger Austria
Heidemarie Gast Switzerland
T.C.A.M. van Woerkom Netherlands
Anna Siatouni Greece
Kathrin Henschel Germany
T.G. van Erp United States
Vicente Iragui‐Madoz United States
B. Jelles relative to R.W.M. Keunen Netherlands R.W.M. Keunen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
R.W.M. Keunen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Jelles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Jelles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Jelles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Jelles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Jelles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Jelles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Jelles. The network helps show where B. Jelles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Jelles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Jelles Line = papers co-authored together B. Jelles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1995139
2 1999109
3 199477
4 200875
5 200474
6 200560
7 200054
8 199646
9 200912
10 19956
11 20084

About B. Jelles

B. Jelles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Oncology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (446 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (153 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (75 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (70 citations) and Signal Processing (37 citations). B. Jelles has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cornelis J. Stam, Joris P. J. Slaets, E.J. Jonkman, Chris H. Polman, Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag, R.W.M. Keunen, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, R. E. M. Hekster, E.L.J. Hoogervorst and Jack Zwemmer. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Topography, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact