Austin T. Mudd
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Infant Nutrition and Health
- Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Infant Nutrition and Health 8
- Child Nutrition and Water Access 2
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 4
- Co-authors
- Ryan N. Dilger (19 shared papers)Sharon M. Donovan (6 shared papers)Kirsten Berding (3 shared papers)Brian Berg (5 shared papers)Lindsey S. Alexander (5 shared papers)Mei Wang (1 shared paper)Rosaline Waworuntu (3 shared papers)Maciej Chichlowski (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Pediatrics (3 papers)Nutrients (3 papers)Journal of Nutrition (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Veterinary Record (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Austin T. Mudd
21 papers receiving 666 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Nutrition and Dietetics 321
- Biological Psychiatry 35
- Pharmacy 28
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 83
- Small Animals 34
Countries citing papers authored by Austin T. Mudd
This map shows the geographic impact of Austin T. Mudd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Austin T. Mudd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin T. Mudd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Austin T. Mudd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Austin T. Mudd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Austin T. Mudd. The network helps show where Austin T. Mudd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Austin T. Mudd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 101 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Austin T. Mudd
Austin T. Mudd is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Hematology and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Nutrition and Health (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (321 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Pharmacy (28 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (83 citations) and Small Animals (34 citations). Austin T. Mudd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ryan N. Dilger, Sharon M. Donovan, Kirsten Berding, Brian Berg, Lindsey S. Alexander, Mei Wang, Rosaline Waworuntu, Maciej Chichlowski, Stephen A. Fleming and Ian Mackie. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pediatrics, Nutrients, Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Veterinary Record.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.