Aurélie Benoit

26 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Aurélie Benoit
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Dentistry 37
  • Orthodontics 84
  • Oral Surgery 73
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 32
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 8
Replace Yannick Tillier with:
Yannick Tillier France
Satoru Hojo Japan
Douglas N. Dederich Canada
A.F. Hall United States
Tamaki Nakano Japan
Ki-Sun Lee South Korea
Richard E. Glena United States
Yoon Joo Choi South Korea
Meiko Oki Japan
Maximilian E.H. Wagner Switzerland
Aurélie Benoit relative to Yannick Tillier France Yannick Tillier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Yannick Tillier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aurélie Benoit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aurélie Benoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aurélie Benoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aurélie Benoit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aurélie Benoit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aurélie Benoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aurélie Benoit. The network helps show where Aurélie Benoit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aurélie Benoit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aurélie Benoit Line = papers co-authored together Aurélie Benoit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201846
2 200940
3 201533
4 201128
5 201325
6 201822
7 202221
8 202121
9 201818
10 202014
11 202012
12 201911
13 202310
14
In vivo dynamic compression has less detrimental effect than static compression on newly formed bone of a rat caudal vertebra.
20169
15 20246
16 20184
17 20243
18 20233
19 20213
20 20202

About Aurélie Benoit

Aurélie Benoit is a scholar working on Orthodontics, Oral Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 28 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental materials and restorations (12 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers), Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (4 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers) and High Temperature Alloys and Creep (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (37 citations), Orthodontics (84 citations), Oral Surgery (73 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (32 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (8 citations). Aurélie Benoit has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudine Wulfman, Marie‐Claire Schanne‐Klein, Jean‐Marc Allain, Gaël Latour, Tanvir Mustafy, Isabelle Villemure, L. Rémy, Caroline Gorin, Irene Londoño and Géraldine Rohman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, The International Journal of Prosthodontics, Journal of Prosthodontics, Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering and Electrophoresis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact