Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

47.3k citations
3.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

3.5k papers receiving 46.0k citations

Peers

Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 5.6k
  • Biomedical Engineering 16.7k
  • Surgery 14.5k
  • Orthodontics 1.3k
  • Oral Surgery 1.9k
Replace Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine with:
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine United Kingdom
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine China
Medical Engineering & Physics United States
BioMedical Engineering OnLine China
Diagnostics Italy
Clinical Anatomy United States
European Spine Journal United States
The Spine Journal United States
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing United States
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Japan
Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering relative to Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine United Kingdom Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering.

About Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

The 3.8k papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 47.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (570 papers), Orthodontics (156 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (170 papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.6k papers) and Surgery (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Elasticity and Material Modeling (393 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (373 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (356 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (242 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (236 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (201 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (188 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering are Todd C. Pataky, Marcus G. Pandy, T. Hildebrand, P. Rüegsegger, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Francisco P. M. Oliveira, Frank C. Anderson, Brian Garner, Ellen Kuhl and A. Shirazi‐Adl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact