Assessment Programme
Impact in
-
- Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Climate change and permafrost
- Cryospheric studies and observations
- Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Papers in
-
- Mercury impact and mitigation studies 3
-
- Indigenous Studies and Ecology 4
In The Last Decade
Assessment Programme
11 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 226
- Atmospheric Science 259
- Environmental Chemistry 69
- Global and Planetary Change 122
- Ecology 140
Countries citing papers authored by Assessment Programme
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessment Programme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessment Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment Programme more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Assessment Programme
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Assessment Programme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Assessment Programme. The network helps show where Assessment Programme may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Assessment Programme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arctic Climate Issues 2011: Changes in Arctic Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost. SWIPA 2011 Overview Report. | 2012 | 220 |
| 2 | Final Report of the Workshop on Adaptation of Climate Scenarios to Arctic Climate Impact Assessments, Oslo, May 14-16, 2007. AMAP Report 2007:4. | 2008 | 183 |
| 3 | AMAP assessment 2009 : human health in the Arctic | 2009 | 64 |
| 4 | Technical background report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment - 2013 | 2013 | 59 |
| 5 | Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013 | 2013 | 30 |
| 6 | AMAP Assessment 2015: Methane as an Arctic climate forcer. | 2015 | 30 |
| 7 | Identification of Arctic marine areas of heightened ecological and cultural significance: Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) IIc | 2013 | 21 |
| 8 | The Arctic Freshwater System in a Changing Climate | 2016 | 13 |
| 9 | Global Mercury Modelling: Update of Modelling Results in the Global Mercury Assessment 2013 | 2015 | 11 |
| 10 | Arctic Pollution 2011 (Mercury). | 2011 | 2 |
| 11 | Technical Background Report to the Global Mercury Assessment 2018 [Pre-print] | 2019 | 1 |
About Assessment Programme
Assessment Programme is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, General Health Professions, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Geology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (3 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (1 paper), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (1 paper), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (1 paper) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (226 citations), Atmospheric Science (259 citations), Environmental Chemistry (69 citations), Global and Planetary Change (122 citations) and Ecology (140 citations). Frequent co-authors include Arctic Monitoring, Kristín Björg Ólafsdóttir and Helgi Jensson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.