Arnold Meadow

31 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Arnold Meadow
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • General Psychology 16
  • Social Psychology 252
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 156
Replace Eugene L. Gaier with:
Eugene L. Gaier United States
David J. Pittenger United States
Duane P. Schultz United States
Harold H. Anderson United States
John Condry United States
Frank J. Atelsek United States
Arthur W. Combs United States
Daphne E. Bugental
Richard Bandler
Susan M. Ervin United States
Arnold Meadow relative to Eugene L. Gaier United States Eugene L. Gaier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Eugene L. Gaier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arnold Meadow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arnold Meadow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arnold Meadow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arnold Meadow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arnold Meadow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arnold Meadow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arnold Meadow. The network helps show where Arnold Meadow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Arnold Meadow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arnold Meadow Line = papers co-authored together Arnold Meadow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1959231
2 1959100
3 195971
4 196554
5 196842
6 196038
7 195834
8 195333
9 195329
10 198120
11
High vs standard dosage fluphenazine HCL in acute schizophrenia.
197820
12 195319
13 196518
14 195213
15 196711
16 195911
17 195111
18 19799
19 19649
20 19528

About Arnold Meadow

Arnold Meadow is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 817 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations), General Psychology (16 citations), Social Psychology (252 citations), Applied Psychology (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (156 citations). Arnold Meadow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sidney J. Parnes, Hayne W. Reese, Louis A. Zürcher, Benjamin Kotkov, Harry C. Solomon, Milton Greenblatt, Roland G. Tharp, Patrick T. Donlon, Daniel H. Funkenstein and Marvin J. Feldman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Psychiatry, American Sociological Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Journal of Marriage and the Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact