Anthony Flew
Impact in
- General Social Sciences top 2%
- Hume's philosophy and hair distribution
- Education top 5%
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Historical Education Studies Worldwide
Papers in
-
- Hume's philosophy and hair distribution 3
- Social Science and Policy Research 2
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
- Co-authors
- John E. McPeck (1 shared paper)Michael V. Williams (1 shared paper)Stephen Turner (1 shared paper)Richard A. Hilbert (1 shared paper)G. P. Henderson (1 shared paper)Stjepan G. Meštrović (1 shared paper)Hywel David Lewis (1 shared paper)Roger Trigg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Educational Studies (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (2 papers)Ethics (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anthony Flew
11 papers receiving 220 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- General Social Sciences 34
- Education 148
- Philosophy 70
- General Psychology 3
- History and Philosophy of Science 14
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Flew
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Flew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Flew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Flew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Flew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Flew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Flew. The network helps show where Anthony Flew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Anthony Flew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 154 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1954 | 7 | |
| 7 | Logic and Language | 1951 | 5 |
| 8 | 1971 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1964 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 0 |
About Anthony Flew
Anthony Flew is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hume's philosophy and hair distribution (3 papers), Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies (2 papers), Social Science and Policy Research (2 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (34 citations), Education (148 citations), Philosophy (70 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Anthony Flew has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John E. McPeck, Michael V. Williams, Stephen Turner, Richard A. Hilbert, G. P. Henderson, Stjepan G. Meštrović, Hywel David Lewis and Roger Trigg. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Studies, The Philosophical Review, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Ethics and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.