Anthony D. Wright

9.0k citations
237 papers · 7.7k · h-index 50

Impact in

Papers in

Anthony D. Wright

232 papers receiving 7.2k citations

Peers

Anthony D. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Biotechnology 2.5k
  • Aquatic Science 970
  • Pharmacology 2.0k
  • Toxicology 315
  • Biochemistry 444
Replace Chang‐Feng Dai with:
Chang‐Feng Dai Taiwan
Anthony R. Carroll Australia
Ernesto Fattorusso Italy
Richard E. Moore United States
Michèle R. Prinsep New Zealand
Ronald J. Quinn Australia
Rob W. M. van Soest Netherlands
Robert J. Capon Australia
Murray H. G. Munro New Zealand
Paul J. Scheuer United States
Anthony D. Wright relative to Chang‐Feng Dai Taiwan Chang‐Feng Dai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chang‐Feng Dai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony D. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony D. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony D. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony D. Wright. The network helps show where Anthony D. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anthony D. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthony D. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Anthony D. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 237 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000294
2 2012210
3 1993181
4 1996145
5 1998144
6 2000136
7 1997135
8 2004116
9 1990110
10 2003109
11 2001108
12 2003106
13 2002106
14 1994100
15 200396
16 201293
17 200090
18 200289
19 200289
20 199688

About Anthony D. Wright

Anthony D. Wright is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Aquatic Science, having authored 237 papers that have together received 7.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (91 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (43 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (30 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (22 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (21 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (20 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (19 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Activity (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (2.5k citations), Aquatic Science (970 citations), Pharmacology (2.0k citations), Toxicology (315 citations) and Biochemistry (444 citations). Anthony D. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele M. König, Otto Sticher, Ulrich Höller, Ronald Kaminsky, Topul Rali, Stefan Kehraus, Rocky de Nys, Gabriele M. König, Ahmed Abdel‐Lateff and Cindy K. Angerhofer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Planta Medica, Phytochemistry, Phytochemical Analysis and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact