Phytochemical Analysis

2.4k papers and 52.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Phytochemical Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 52.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytochemical Analysis usually cover Molecular Biology (1.2k papers), Plant Science (841 papers) and Food Science (415 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (471 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (331 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytochemical Analysis are Robert Verpoorte, Teris A. van Beek, Philippe Christen, C.P.G.M. de Groot, Béatrice Kaufmann, L. Evstatieva, J.P.H. Linssen, Irina Koleva, Guido F. Pauli and Giorgio Gambino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Phytochemical Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytochemical Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytochemical Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Phytochemical Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytochemical Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytochemical Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytochemical Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025