Anouk E. de Wit

15 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Anouk E. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 104
  • Physiology 22
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 161
Replace Christopher D. John with:
Christopher D. John United Kingdom
Lorena Abarzúa-Catalán Chile
Marie Tobin United States
Sejal R. Patel United Kingdom
Kristiina Kask Sweden
Susan E. Nicol United States
Martha L. Elks United States
N Laflamme Canada
Winfried G. Rossmanith Germany
Michelle Battistini United States
Anouk E. de Wit relative to Christopher D. John United Kingdom Christopher D. John's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
Christopher D. John · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anouk E. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anouk E. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anouk E. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anouk E. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anouk E. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anouk E. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anouk E. de Wit. The network helps show where Anouk E. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anouk E. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anouk E. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Anouk E. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201982
2 201974
3 201551
4 202151
5 202141
6 202134
7 202125
8 202224
9 202123
10 202116
11 201713
12 202113
13 201811
14 20208
15 20218

About Anouk E. de Wit

Anouk E. de Wit is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology and Gastroenterology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Brain Metastases and Treatment (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (104 citations), Physiology (22 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (161 citations). Anouk E. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Erik J. Giltay, Robert A. Schoevers, Hadine Joffe, Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Marrit K. de Boer, Sanne Henrieke Booij, Aleta S. Wiley, Frances S. Chen, Ymkje Anna de Vries and Christine Anderl. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact