Anne Messer

110 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Anne Messer
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.3k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 274
  • Neurology 970
  • Neurology 472
  • Molecular Biology 2.8k
Replace Concepción Lillo with:
Concepción Lillo United States
Gerardo Morfini United States
Peter E. Braun Canada
Mark A. Marchionni United States
Jacqueline O. Gonatas United States
Dionisio Martı́n-Zanca United States
James Garbern United States
Andreas Gal Germany
Kelly R. Monk United States
Richard T. Libby United States
Anne Messer relative to Concepción Lillo United States Concepción Lillo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Concepción Lillo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Messer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Messer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Messer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Messer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Messer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Messer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Messer. The network helps show where Anne Messer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Messer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Messer Line = papers co-authored together Anne Messer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999321
2 2000247
3 1999247
4 1977204
5 2001166
6 2004149
7 2005113
8 2013111
9 2010106
10 2007100
11 200495
12 199892
13 200488
14 199987
15 200486
16 198680
17 201876
18 199269
19 201169
20 201064

About Anne Messer

Anne Messer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 110 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (39 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (24 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (16 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (13 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (12 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (10 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.3k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (274 citations), Neurology (970 citations), Neurology (472 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.8k citations). Anne Messer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Manley, David C. Butler, Lorraine Flaherty, Thomas L. Shirley, Joseph E. Mazurkiewicz, Chun Hui Zhou, Todd W. Miller, Michael R. Sierks, Julie A. Plummer and Abigail Snyder‐Keller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurogenetics, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact