Anne E. Preston

71 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Anne E. Preston
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Safety Research 316
  • General Decision Sciences 67
  • Applied Psychology 152
  • Gender Studies 276
  • Public Administration 84
Replace Neil Douglas Christiansen with:
Neil Douglas Christiansen United States
Dirk D. Steiner France
Dolly Chugh United States
Roseanne J. Foti United States
Joan E. Sieber United States
Kevin W. Rockmann United States
Joris Lammers Germany
Stefanie K. Johnson United States
George Levinger United States
Helmut Lamm Germany
Anne E. Preston relative to Neil Douglas Christiansen United States Neil Douglas Christiansen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Neil Douglas Christiansen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Preston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Preston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Preston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Preston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Preston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Preston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Preston. The network helps show where Anne E. Preston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Preston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Preston Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Preston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989286
2 1962182
3 1962154
4 201187
5 202080
6 199175
7 198874
8 196470
9
Why Have All the Women Gone? A Study of Exit of Women from the Science and Engineering Professions
199448
10 202347
11 196043
12 196043
13 201542
14 199041
15 200841
16 201637
17 198832
18 201230
19 201828
20 201127

About Anne E. Preston

Anne E. Preston is a scholar working on Safety Research, Gender Studies, General Decision Sciences, Demography and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (6 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (4 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (316 citations), General Decision Sciences (67 citations), Applied Psychology (152 citations), Gender Studies (276 citations) and Public Administration (84 citations). Anne E. Preston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Vaughn J. Crandall, Linda Kamas, Walter Katkovsky, Casey Ichniowski, Ahmed Kharrufa, Patrick L. Olivier, Sandy Baum, Shaimaa Lazem, Madeline Balaam and Lin Mei. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Feminist Economics, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and Smart Learning Environments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact