Anne E. Imamura

632 citations
23 papers · 386 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anne E. Imamura

20 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Anne E. Imamura
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cultural Studies 90
  • Gender Studies 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 214
  • Demography 53
  • Public Administration 13
Replace Aimee Carrillo Rowe with:
Aimee Carrillo Rowe United States
Sepp Linhart Austria
Richard Griswold del Castillo United States
Phyllis Pease Chock United States
Ross Mouer Australia
José E. Limón United States
Miliann Kang United States
Kumiko Nemoto United States
Noel Ignatiev United States
Martina Deuchler United Kingdom
Anne E. Imamura relative to Aimee Carrillo Rowe United States Aimee Carrillo Rowe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Aimee Carrillo Rowe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Imamura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Imamura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Imamura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Imamura more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Imamura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Imamura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Imamura. The network helps show where Anne E. Imamura may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Imamura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Imamura Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Imamura links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999100
2 199769
3 199743
4
Transcending Stereotypes: Discovering Japanese Culture and Education
199139
5 199026
6 198812
7 198812
8 198811
9 19908
10 19838
11 19978
12 19837
13 19877
14 19866
15 19886
16 19976
17 19996
18 19925
19 19884
20 19932

About Anne E. Imamura

Anne E. Imamura is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (90 citations), Gender Studies (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (214 citations), Demography (53 citations) and Public Administration (13 citations). Anne E. Imamura has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yuko Ogasawara, Anne Allison, Janet Hunter, Joseph Tobin, Susan Long, Merry White, William Kevin Kelly, Joy Hendry, Carmi Schooler and Sepp Linhart. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Japanese Studies, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Gender & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact