Anne E. Hill

82 papers receiving 921 citations

Peers

Anne E. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Family Practice 37
  • Occupational Therapy 49
  • Research and Theory 9
  • General Health Professions 253
  • Speech and Hearing 65
Replace Anne Koerber with:
Anne Koerber United States
Till Johannes Bugaj Germany
Lucia Prihodová Ireland
JESSICA H. MULLER United States
Angela M. McNelis United States
Michael B. Pitt United States
Robert P. Butters United States
Jennifer A. Villwock United States
Carl V. Tyler United States
Brian Hennen Canada
Anne E. Hill relative to Anne Koerber United States Anne Koerber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
Anne Koerber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Hill. The network helps show where Anne E. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200976
2 201276
3 201357
4 198750
5 202040
6 201539
7 202037
8 200736
9 195134
10 201032
11
Speech-language pathology students' perceptions of a standardised patient clinic.
201328
12 201224
13 201323
14 201422
15 201321
16 202016
17 202215
18 199015
19 201715
20 202114

About Anne E. Hill

Anne E. Hill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Occupational Therapy and Orthodontics, having authored 86 papers that have together received 975 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (21 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (15 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (11 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (5 papers), Dental materials and restorations (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (37 citations), Occupational Therapy (49 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), General Health Professions (253 citations) and Speech and Hearing (65 citations). Anne E. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bronwyn Joy Davidson, Deborah Theodoros, Sally Hewat, Jodie Copley, Allison Mandrusiak, Nerina Scarinci, Elizabeth Celeste Ward, Peter J. Buttrum, Wayne J. Wilson and Alison Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Journal of Interprofessional Care, International Journal of Audiology and Dysphagia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact