Anne E. Fortune

1.1k citations
49 papers · 824 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Anne E. Fortune

44 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Anne E. Fortune
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Public Administration 542
  • General Health Professions 450
  • Social Psychology 199
  • Education 236
  • Clinical Psychology 155
Replace Jo Ann Larsen with:
Jo Ann Larsen United States
Thomas M. Meenaghan United States
Carlton E. Munson United States
Pamela Trevithick United Kingdom
Jane Maidment Australia
Carel B. Germain United States
Jayshree S. Jani United States
Larry Ortiz United States
León Ginsberg United States
Kimberly Strom‐Gottfried United States
Anne E. Fortune relative to Jo Ann Larsen United States Jo Ann Larsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Jo Ann Larsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Fortune

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Fortune's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Fortune with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Fortune more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Fortune

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Fortune. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Fortune. The network helps show where Anne E. Fortune may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Fortune, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Fortune Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Fortune links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001131
2 199395
3 198563
4 200563
5 199042
6 199235
7 200733
8 201333
9 198730
10 198726
11 201321
12 200321
13 200318
14 202118
15 200717
16 201517
17 198812
18 198711
19 199211
20 200710

About Anne E. Fortune

Anne E. Fortune is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Education, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (26 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (542 citations), General Health Professions (450 citations), Social Psychology (199 citations), Education (236 citations) and Clinical Psychology (155 citations). Anne E. Fortune has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julie S. Abramson, Mingun Lee, Mary McCarthy, Robert G. Green, Qiang Chen, Paul P. Urbanski, Philip McCallion, Katharine Briar‐Lawson, Victoria M. Rizzo and Guerrino Macori. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work Education, The Clinical Supervisor, Social Service Review, Journal of Gerontological Social Work and Journal of Social Service Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact