Anna-Lisa Hellsing

1.2k citations
18 papers · 923 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 13
    • Occupational Health and Performance 4
    • Occupational Therapy Practice and Research 2

Anna-Lisa Hellsing

18 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers

Anna-Lisa Hellsing
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pharmacology 533
  • Occupational Therapy 116
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 32
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 133
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 58
Replace G Mellin with:
G Mellin Finland
Leonard N. Matheson United States
Nancy D. Kishino United States
Mario Gestoso Spain
Sheila Reid United States
Päivi Leino Finland
HANS-OLOF SVENSSON Sweden
Hans Heneweer Netherlands
Susan Ferry United Kingdom
Andreas Klipstein Switzerland
Anna-Lisa Hellsing relative to G Mellin Finland G Mellin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
G Mellin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna-Lisa Hellsing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna-Lisa Hellsing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna-Lisa Hellsing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna-Lisa Hellsing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna-Lisa Hellsing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna-Lisa Hellsing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna-Lisa Hellsing. The network helps show where Anna-Lisa Hellsing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anna-Lisa Hellsing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna-Lisa Hellsing Line = papers co-authored together Anna-Lisa Hellsing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1998232
2 2000164
3 1993130
4 199478
5 200076
6 198845
7 199638
8 199334
9 199531
10 199427
11 198826
12 199720
13 200010
14 19976
15 19883
16 19941
17 19981
18 19891

About Anna-Lisa Hellsing

Anna-Lisa Hellsing is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Occupational Therapy, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Occupational health in dentistry (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (533 citations), Occupational Therapy (116 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (32 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (133 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (58 citations). Anna-Lisa Hellsing has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Linton, KARIN HALLDÉN, D. K. G. Andersson, Nina Buer, Ing‐Liss Bryngelsson, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Günnar Bergström, Irené Larsson and Birgitta Andershed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Spine, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, Pain and Clinical Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact