Anna Williams

72 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Anna Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Research and Theory 60
  • General Health Professions 559
  • Pharmacy 59
  • Clinical Psychology 221
  • Emergency Medical Services 69
Replace Connie M. Ulrich with:
Connie M. Ulrich United States
Christine Catling Australia
Jan Angus Canada
Masoud Bahrami Iran
Beverley O’Brien Canada
Charlotte Delmar Denmark
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
May Solveig Fagermoen Norway
Arminée Kazanjian Canada
Helen Allan United Kingdom
Anna Williams relative to Connie M. Ulrich United States Connie M. Ulrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Connie M. Ulrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Williams. The network helps show where Anna Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Williams Line = papers co-authored together Anna Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012201
2 2020186
3 2008115
4 202095
5 200181
6 201977
7 200970
8 202169
9 200860
10 201260
11 199459
12 201556
13 200851
14 200946
15 202145
16 201542
17 201541
18 200941
19
The 45 year old health check - feasibility and impact on practices and patient behaviour.
200937
20 201627

About Anna Williams

Anna Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (6 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (60 citations), General Health Professions (559 citations), Pharmacy (59 citations), Clinical Psychology (221 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (69 citations). Anna Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gawaine Powell Davies, Susan McInnes, Elizabeth Halcomb, Mark Harris, Kaara Ray B. Calma, Christine Ashley, Catherine Stephen, Sharon James, Nicholas Zwar and Alison Twycross. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Nursing Management, BMC Health Services Research, BMC Nursing and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact