Anna Tropea

1k citations
40 papers · 883 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Tropea

38 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers

Anna Tropea
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 472
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 81
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 66
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 59
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 45
Replace Federica Romani with:
Federica Romani Italy
Maria Cândida Pinheiro Baracat Brazil
Edward Teague United States
Li Tian China
Ewa Mlyczyńska Poland
Yoshihito Nakanishi Japan
Anastasia G. Goumenou Greece
Fritz Wieser Austria
Carla Cristina Maganhin Brazil
Mariana M. Yates United States
Anna Tropea relative to Federica Romani Italy Federica Romani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Federica Romani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Tropea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Tropea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Tropea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Tropea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Tropea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Tropea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Tropea. The network helps show where Anna Tropea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Tropea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Tropea Line = papers co-authored together Anna Tropea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200775
2 201774
3 200753
4 201448
5 201147
6 200446
7 201442
8 200639
9 201031
10 201731
11 200729
12 201226
13 200325
14 201224
15 200923
16 201123
17 201923
18 201322
19 201218
20 201017

About Anna Tropea

Anna Tropea is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Immunology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 883 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (22 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (472 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (81 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (66 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (59 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (45 citations). Anna Tropea has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rosanna Apa, Antonio L’Abbate, Federica Romani, Elisa Scarinci, Stefania Catino, Francesca Minici, Maria Francesca Gangalè, F. Moro, Fiorella Miceli and Francesca Sagnella. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Reproductive Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact