Reproductive Sciences

3.5k papers and 55.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Reproductive Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 55.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Reproductive Sciences usually cover Reproductive Medicine (1.5k papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.4k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive System and Pregnancy (878 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (801 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (680 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reproductive Sciences are Hugh S. Taylor, Sun‐Wei Guo, Felice Petraglia, Jerome F. Strauss, Xishi Liu, Linda C. Giudice, Ayman Al‐Hendy, John Challis, Robert N. Taylor and Jane E. Norman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reproductive Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reproductive Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reproductive Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Reproductive Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reproductive Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reproductive Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reproductive Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025