Anna Tomberg

18 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Anna Tomberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 108
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 155
  • Organic Chemistry 275
  • Materials Chemistry 443
  • Inorganic Chemistry 108
Replace Tom A. Young with:
Tom A. Young United Kingdom
Josef M. Maier United States
Sarah J. Pike United Kingdom
François Gilardoni Switzerland
Valerie Vaissier Welborn United States
Cheng‐Wei Ju China
Marco Foscato Norway
Dennis Svatunek Austria
Maria Cristina Misuraca United Kingdom
Igor Huskić Canada
Anna Tomberg relative to Tom A. Young United Kingdom Tom A. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Tom A. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Tomberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Tomberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Tomberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Tomberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Tomberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Tomberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Tomberg. The network helps show where Anna Tomberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Tomberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Tomberg Line = papers co-authored together Anna Tomberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013280
2 2021126
3 201864
4 201648
5 201845
6 202040
7 201939
8 201535
9 201433
10 201329
11 201513
12 20159
13 20168
14 20186
15 20244
16 20213
17 20213
18 20172
19
Towards virtual biocatalysis: computational methods development for organometallic catalysts and enzyme engineering
20180
20 20250

About Anna Tomberg

Anna Tomberg is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (3 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (108 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (155 citations), Organic Chemistry (275 citations), Materials Chemistry (443 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (108 citations). Anna Tomberg has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Oleksandr S. Bushuyev, Christopher J. Barrett, Tomislav Friščić, Per‐Ola Norrby, Christian Sköld, Magnus J. Johansson, Nicolas Moitessier, Kjell Jorner, Christoph Bauer and Jonas Boström. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Nature Reviews Chemistry, Chemical Communications, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact