Jon Moen

115 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Jon Moen's Hit Papers

Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species 2013 · 1.1k citations
1.1k0+4+8Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

Jon Moen
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 460
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.8k
  • Ecology 1.7k
  • Atmospheric Science 1.1k
Replace Shonil Bhagwat with:
Shonil Bhagwat United Kingdom
Marielos Peña‐Claros Netherlands
K. J. Kirby United Kingdom
Glenn P. Juday United States
Jeremy Russell‐Smith Australia
Suzanne M. Prober Australia
Dan F. B. Flynn United States
Kenneth R. Young United States
Lars Östlund Sweden
Ricardo Rozzi Chile
Jon Moen relative to Shonil Bhagwat United Kingdom Shonil Bhagwat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Shonil Bhagwat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Moen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Moen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Moen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Moen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Moen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Moen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Moen. The network helps show where Jon Moen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Moen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Moen Line = papers co-authored together Jon Moen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species
Hit paper breakdown →
20131137
2 2006223
3 2004209
4 2006173
5 2007136
6 2004135
7 2003121
8 2006114
9 2014102
10 2015100
11 201397
12 199395
13 200291
14 200387
15 200586
16 200879
17 201075
18 200970
19 201970
20 200868

About Jon Moen

Jon Moen is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, General Health Professions and Atmospheric Science, having authored 121 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (26 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (25 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (19 papers), Forest Management and Policy (17 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (13 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (460 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.8k citations), Ecology (1.7k citations) and Atmospheric Science (1.1k citations). Jon Moen has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lauri Oksanen, David M. Cairns, Anders Angerbjörn, Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Öje Danell, Jan Bengtsson, Hans Henrik Bruun, Johan Olofsson, Tord Snäll and Micael Jonsson. Their work appears in journals such as Oikos, AMBIO, Ecography, Journal of Vegetation Science and Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact