Anna Singleton

33 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Anna Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Family Practice 35
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • General Health Professions 127
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
  • Oncology 78
Replace Gaby Anne Wildenbos with:
Gaby Anne Wildenbos Netherlands
María de los Ángeles Rodríguez Gázquez Colombia
Tiffany Bullard United States
Julie M. Hook United States
Maria C. Swartz United States
H. Gene McFadden United States
Yan‐Min Xu China
Μαριάννα Μαντζώρου Greece
Soo Hyun Kim South Korea
Dennis P. McNeilly United States
Anna Singleton relative to Gaby Anne Wildenbos Netherlands Gaby Anne Wildenbos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Gaby Anne Wildenbos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Singleton. The network helps show where Anna Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Singleton Line = papers co-authored together Anna Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020112
2 201883
3 202271
4 201927
5 202125
6 202225
7 202125
8 202022
9 202121
10 201920
11 202217
12 202015
13 201914
14 202114
15 202112
16 201912
17 201611
18 20199
19 20229
20 20237

About Anna Singleton

Anna Singleton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Family Practice, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (35 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations) and Oncology (78 citations). Anna Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julie Redfern, Stephanie R. Partridge, Rebecca Raeside, Karice Hyun, Clara K Chow, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Karla Santo, Si Si Jia, Kerry A. Sherman and Elisabeth Elder. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, BMJ Open and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact