Michael Cooper

2.2k citations
86 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Cooper

83 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Reproductive Medicine 597
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 395
  • Emergency Medicine 87
  • Surgery 385
  • Instrumentation 24
Replace Nolan Karstaedt with:
Nolan Karstaedt United States
John A. Dixon United States
S Noma Japan
Sarah Sarvis Milla United States
Guillaume Legendre France
Anil N. Shetty United States
Takayuki Masui Japan
I. R. Johnson United Kingdom
R. Barnard United Kingdom
Colin R. McArdle United States
Michael Cooper relative to Nolan Karstaedt United States Nolan Karstaedt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.7×
Nolan Karstaedt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cooper. The network helps show where Michael Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002178
2 2012124
3 2009110
4 1994103
5 200985
6 200545
7 201444
8 199641
9 200737
10 202335
11 201333
12 202131
13 200831
14 200229
15 201229
16 201425
17 201823
18 201219
19 200419
20 200918

About Michael Cooper

Michael Cooper is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (23 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (21 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (8 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (7 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (6 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (597 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (395 citations), Emergency Medicine (87 citations), Surgery (385 citations) and Instrumentation (24 citations). Michael Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip Kaloo, Geoffrey Reid, Tuan V. Nguyen, David Molloy, Barry E. Burke, R. W. Mountain, P. Daniels, Marc J. N. C. Keirse, Ian S. Fraser and Mark A. Carlton. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact