Anna Schritz

882 citations
24 papers · 599 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Schritz

24 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Anna Schritz
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 280
  • Physiology 232
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 26
  • Economics and Econometrics 174
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
Replace Bruno Mazzei with:
Bruno Mazzei Italy
Arseniy Yashkin United States
Camilla Prete Italy
H. J. Cohen United States
Jiang Wang China
Chuan‐Wei Yang Taiwan
André Fattori Brazil
Flávia Mayer Italy
Rongrong Yang China
Peter Garvin Sweden
Anna Schritz relative to Bruno Mazzei Italy Bruno Mazzei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Bruno Mazzei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schritz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schritz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schritz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schritz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schritz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schritz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schritz. The network helps show where Anna Schritz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schritz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Schritz Line = papers co-authored together Anna Schritz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017197
2 201863
3 201961
4 201852
5 201746
6 201731
7 201725
8 202119
9 201817
10 202116
11 201614
12 202012
13 201611
14 20199
15 20205
16 20224
17 20194
18 20223
19 20242
20
Nutzer und Nutzerinnen regionaler Demenznetzwerke in Deutschland: Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluationsstudie DemNet-D
20172

About Anna Schritz

Anna Schritz is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (280 citations), Physiology (232 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations), Economics and Econometrics (174 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (15 citations). Anna Schritz has collaborated with scholars based in Luxembourg, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Saverio Stranges, Anne‐Françoise Donneau, Gloria Aguayo, Michèle Guillaume, Michel Vaillant, Daniel R. Witte, Laurent Malisoux, Oscar H. Franco, Laëtitia Huiart and Stephen Senn. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Endocrinology, British Journal of Cancer, PLoS Medicine, Medicine and Pediatric Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact