Anna Schliehe

769 citations
21 papers · 378 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Schliehe

18 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Anna Schliehe
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 313
  • General Health Professions 162
  • Clinical Psychology 113
  • Geography, Planning and Development 28
  • Urban Studies 20
Replace Laura Piacentini with:
Laura Piacentini United Kingdom
­Bree Carlton Australia
Rod Earle United Kingdom
Georgina Ramsay Australia
Thalia Anthony Australia
Josh Seim United States
Elizabeth Brown United States
David Marshall United States
Jane Helleiner Canada
Annika Lems Germany
Anna Schliehe relative to Laura Piacentini United Kingdom Laura Piacentini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Laura Piacentini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schliehe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schliehe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schliehe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schliehe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schliehe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schliehe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schliehe. The network helps show where Anna Schliehe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schliehe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Schliehe Line = papers co-authored together Anna Schliehe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017148
2 202231
3 201330
4 201623
5 202120
6 201818
7 202115
8 201715
9 202014
10 202214
11 202112
12 20229
13 20209
14 20229
15 20215
16 20223
17 20221
18 20161
19 20211
20 20220

About Anna Schliehe

Anna Schliehe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Urban Studies and Demography, having authored 21 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (313 citations), General Health Professions (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (28 citations) and Urban Studies (20 citations). Anna Schliehe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Moran, Jennifer Turner, Ben Crewe, Julie Laursen, Tom Disney, Kristian Mjåland, Alistair Fraser, Alice Ievins, Giovanni La Penna and Chris Philo. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Criminology, The British Journal of Criminology, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Progress in Human Geography and Qualitative Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact