Annika Lems

635 citations
30 papers · 381 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Annika Lems

27 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Annika Lems
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Clinical Psychology 158
  • Sociology and Political Science 298
  • Demography 61
  • Urban Studies 22
  • Geography, Planning and Development 18
Replace Federico Rahola with:
Federico Rahola Italy
Irene Peano Portugal
Lisa Riedner Germany
Georgina Ramsay Australia
Nicholas De Genova Canada
Lorenzo Pezzani United Kingdom
David Marshall United States
Ishan Ashutosh United States
Milena Belloni Belgium
Ċetta Mainwaring United Kingdom
Annika Lems relative to Federico Rahola Italy Federico Rahola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Federico Rahola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Lems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Lems's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Lems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Lems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Lems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Lems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Lems. The network helps show where Annika Lems may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Annika Lems, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annika Lems Line = papers co-authored together Annika Lems links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201476
2 201971
3 201947
4 201932
5 201827
6 201427
7 202016
8 201614
9 202013
10 201910
11 20157
12
The (im)possibility of ethnographic research during Corona
20206
13 20224
14
Introduction: displacement and new sociabilities
20184
15 20184
16 20163
17 20213
18 20202
19 20232
20 20162

About Annika Lems

Annika Lems is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (15 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (7 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers) and Children's Rights and Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (298 citations), Demography (61 citations), Urban Studies (22 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (18 citations). Annika Lems has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sabine Strasser, Milena Belloni, Elaine Chase, Ulrika Wernesjö, Klaus Neumann, Sandra M. Gifford, Heike Drotbohm and Raelene Wilding. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, International Migration, Continuum, Ethnos and Dialectical Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact