Anna Sandberg

768 citations
46 papers · 461 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Sandberg

43 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Anna Sandberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Family Practice 19
  • Software 38
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 114
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Information Systems 119
Replace David Shields with:
David Shields United States
Artur Akbarov United Kingdom
Michael P. O’Brien Ireland
Houman Younessi Australia
Nan‐Chen Hsieh Taiwan
Joshua C. Mandel United States
Mark Evans United Kingdom
Kaan Katırcıoğlu United States
Miodrag Djordjević Serbia
Bruce I. Blum United States
Anna Sandberg relative to David Shields United States David Shields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
David Shields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Sandberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Sandberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Sandberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Sandberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Sandberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Sandberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Sandberg. The network helps show where Anna Sandberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Sandberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Sandberg Line = papers co-authored together Anna Sandberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201165
2
Experimental and clinical adventures with large doses of gamma and other globulins as anticancer agents.
195727
3 201726
4 202023
5 201723
6 201322
7 201921
8 201121
9 201621
10 202019
11 202019
12 201816
13 201216
14 202111
15 202211
16 200911
17 201710
18 201310
19 20219
20 20179

About Anna Sandberg

Anna Sandberg is a scholar working on Information Systems, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems, having authored 46 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (11 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (7 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (5 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers) and Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (19 citations), Software (38 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (114 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations) and Information Systems (119 citations). Anna Sandberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lars Pareto, Thomas Arts, Miroslaw Staron, Lars Mathiassen, Annie Nikolajsen, Pierre Johansen, Moore Ge, Amos Db, Matthew Capehorn and Sarah Buchs. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software, Value in Health, Advances in Therapy, European Journal of Information Systems and Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact