Anna Sandberg

792 citations
49 papers · 595 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Sandberg

46 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Anna Sandberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Software 54
  • Family Practice 16
  • Information Systems 216
  • Computer Science Applications 50
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 116
Replace David E. Shields with:
David E. Shields United States
Houman Younessi Australia
Michael P. O’Brien Ireland
Werner Esswein Germany
Karl A. Stroetmann Germany
Radmila Juric United Kingdom
Keith Frampton Australia
Liora Alschuler United States
Dong Shao China
Tuomo Kähkönen Finland
Anna Sandberg relative to David E. Shields United States David E. Shields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
David E. Shields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Sandberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Sandberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Sandberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Sandberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Sandberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Sandberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Sandberg. The network helps show where Anna Sandberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Sandberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Sandberg Line = papers co-authored together Anna Sandberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201188
2 201447
3 201733
4 202029
5
Experimental and clinical adventures with large doses of gamma and other globulins as anticancer agents.
195728
6 201723
7 201323
8 201122
9 201922
10 201621
11 202019
12 202019
13 201718
14 201218
15 201818
16 201617
17 201314
18 200913
19 202213
20 202111

About Anna Sandberg

Anna Sandberg is a scholar working on Information Systems, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Software, Management Information Systems and Hematology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (14 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (7 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (7 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (54 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Information Systems (216 citations), Computer Science Applications (50 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (116 citations). Anna Sandberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Lars Pareto, Thomas Arts, Miroslaw Staron, Helena Holmström Olsson, Eric Knauss, Lars Mathiassen, Annie Nikolajsen, Pierre Johansen, Amos Db and Ivica Crnković. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software, Advances in Therapy, European Journal of Information Systems, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism and Journal of Medical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact