Anna Reading

1.9k citations
63 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Reading

61 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers

Anna Reading
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Communication 209
  • Social Psychology 461
  • Museology 75
  • Conservation 48
  • Philosophy 164
Replace Emily Keightley with:
Emily Keightley United Kingdom
Vered Vinitzky‐Seroussi Israel
Wulf Kansteiner Denmark
John Czaplicka
Ansgar Nünning Germany
Greg Dickinson United States
Oren Meyers Israel
Brian L. Ott United States
Hal Foster United States
Sadie Plant Netherlands
Anna Reading relative to Emily Keightley United Kingdom Emily Keightley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Emily Keightley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Reading

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Reading's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Reading more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Reading

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Reading. The network helps show where Anna Reading may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Anna Reading, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Reading Line = papers co-authored together Anna Reading links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009200
2
Communism, Capitalism and the Mass Media
199889
3 201172
4 200352
5 200951
6 201648
7 201444
8 201439
9 201138
10 200934
11 200234
12 201133
13 200933
14 200730
15 199428
16 200226
17 201525
18 201520
19
Digital Memories: Exploring Critical Issues
200920
20
The Media in Britain: Current Debates and Developments
199919

About Anna Reading

Anna Reading is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (18 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (8 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Irish and British Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (209 citations), Social Psychology (461 citations), Museology (75 citations), Conservation (48 citations) and Philosophy (164 citations). Anna Reading has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Garde‐Hansen, Andrew Hoskins, Colin Sparks, Emily Keightley, Tamar Katriel, Tanya Notley, Jane Stokes, Peggy Watson, Chris Corrin and Nanette Funk. Their work appears in journals such as Media Culture & Society, Memory Studies, European Journal of Cultural Studies, European Journal of Women s Studies and Continuum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact