Jane Stokes
Impact in
-
- Media Studies and Communication
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
Papers in
-
- Communication Studies and Media 1
- Co-authors
- Anna Reading (1 shared paper)Julie Marshall (1 shared paper)Khalid Hussein (1 shared paper)Róisín McNaney (1 shared paper)Santi Indra Astuti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)Multilingual Matters eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGhana
In The Last Decade
Jane Stokes
15 papers receiving 134 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Communication 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 39
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 10
- Cultural Studies 14
- Gender Studies 15
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stokes. The network helps show where Jane Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 3 | How to do media & cultural studies | 2003 | 23 |
| 4 | The Media in Britain: Current Debates and Developments | 1999 | 19 |
| 5 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 6 | On Screen Rivals: Cinema and Television in the United States and Britain | 1999 | 11 |
| 7 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 8 | Speech and Language Therapy and Professional Identity; challenging received wisdom | 2015 | 6 |
| 9 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 14 | How to do Media and Cultural Studies : panduan untuk melaksanakan penelitian dalam kajian... | 2006 | 1 |
| 15 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0 |
About Jane Stokes
Jane Stokes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper), SMEs Development and Digital Marketing (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper), Communication Studies and Media (1 paper) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (26 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 citations), Cultural Studies (14 citations) and Gender Studies (15 citations). Jane Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Anna Reading, Julie Marshall, Khalid Hussein, Róisín McNaney and Santi Indra Astuti. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Multilingual Matters eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.