Jane Stokes

438 citations
10 papers · 126 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Social Media and Politics
    • Media, Gender, and Advertising
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Papers in

Jane Stokes

10 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Jane Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Communication 25
  • Gender Studies 14
  • Cultural Studies 12
  • Literature and Literary Theory 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 48
Replace César González Ochoa with:
César González Ochoa Mexico
Brett Farmer Australia
Sarah Park Dahlen United States
Jacqueline Wernimont United States
Ruth Ayaß Germany
Heidi Jacobs Canada
Bengt Nordberg
Masood Khoshsaligheh Iran
David Katan Italy
Trevor Boffone United States
Jane Stokes relative to César González Ochoa Mexico César González Ochoa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
César González Ochoa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stokes. The network helps show where Jane Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Jane Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 202145
2
How to do media & cultural studies
200321
3
The Media in Britain: Current Debates and Developments
199918
4 202017
5
On Screen Rivals: Cinema and Television in the United States and Britain
19999
6
Speech and Language Therapy and Professional Identity; challenging received wisdom
20156
7 20135
8 19993
9
How to do Media and Cultural Studies : panduan untuk melaksanakan penelitian dalam kajian...
20061
10 20171

About Jane Stokes

Jane Stokes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 10 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper), Reflective Practices in Education (1 paper), Islamic Finance and Communication (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), SMEs Development and Digital Marketing (1 paper), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (25 citations), Gender Studies (14 citations), Cultural Studies (12 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (48 citations). Jane Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Anna Reading, Róisín McNaney, Khalid Hussein, Julie Marshall and Santi Indra Astuti. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact