Anna Prokop‐Dorner

17 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Anna Prokop‐Dorner
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 134
  • Ecology 89
  • Animal Science and Zoology 28
  • Physiology 49
  • Food Science 33
Replace Ruth Richardson with:
Ruth Richardson United States
Abrania Marrero United States
Sparkle Springfield United States
Daiga Grīnberga Lithuania
Theodoros Dardavesis Greece
Grzegorz Wójcik Poland
M. Brown United Kingdom
Katie Brown United States
Alexa Hayley Australia
Suruchi Mishra United States
Anna Prokop‐Dorner relative to Ruth Richardson United States Ruth Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ruth Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Prokop‐Dorner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Prokop‐Dorner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Prokop‐Dorner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Prokop‐Dorner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Prokop‐Dorner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Prokop‐Dorner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Prokop‐Dorner. The network helps show where Anna Prokop‐Dorner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Prokop‐Dorner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Prokop‐Dorner Line = papers co-authored together Anna Prokop‐Dorner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019174
2 201951
3 201719
4 202216
5 202214
6 202211
7 20178
8 20226
9
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption
20195
10 20215
11 20225
12 20244
13 20204
14 20211
15 20241
16 20241
17 20171
18 20250
19 20210
20 20220

About Anna Prokop‐Dorner

Anna Prokop‐Dorner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Ecology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Social Issues in Poland (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper) and Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (134 citations), Ecology (89 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (28 citations), Physiology (49 citations) and Food Science (33 citations). Anna Prokop‐Dorner has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Małgorzata M Bała, J. Zając, Bradley C. Johnston, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Gordon Guyatt, Montserrat Rabassa, Claudia Valli, Mi Ah Han, Robin W.M. Vernooij and Dena Zeraatkar. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact