Anna Proia

2.0k citations
26 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Proia

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anna Proia
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 95
  • Physiology 467
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 224
  • Neurology 150
  • Neurology 78
Replace Shen‐Long Howng with:
Shen‐Long Howng Taiwan
Patrizia Amadio Italy
Yasuhiro Arai Japan
Camilla Steen Jensen Denmark
Jean‐Marie Cuisset France
Eduard L. E. M. Bollen Netherlands
Jiro Nakano Japan
Carlo Gandolfo Italy
Sanish Sathyan United States
Bharti Manwani United States
Anna Proia relative to Shen‐Long Howng Taiwan Shen‐Long Howng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Shen‐Long Howng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Proia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Proia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Proia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Proia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Proia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Proia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Proia. The network helps show where Anna Proia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Proia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Proia Line = papers co-authored together Anna Proia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011278
2 2011262
3 2004142
4 1986142
5 198790
6 200165
7 200446
8
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: prospective neurologic, neuroimaging and neurophysiologic evaluation.
200131
9 201330
10 200230
11 200628
12 199627
13
The functional role of the pedunculopontine nucleus in the regulation of the electrical activity of entopeduncular neurons in the rat.
198820
14 202318
15 200317
16 200416
17 200015
18 200413
19 201011
20 200011

About Anna Proia

Anna Proia is a scholar working on Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Immunology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Physiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (95 citations), Physiology (467 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (224 citations), Neurology (150 citations) and Neurology (78 citations). Anna Proia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Eugenio Scarnati, Roberto Bernabei, Graziano Onder, Francesco Landi, Rosa Liperoti, Simona Mastropaolo, Domenico Fusco, C Pacitti, E Campana and Andrea Russo. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Annals of Hematology, Annals of Oncology, Blood and Eurosurveillance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact