Anna Parker

479 citations
17 papers · 266 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Parker

15 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Anna Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 110
  • General Health Professions 87
  • Virology 14
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 20
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 14
Replace Natalie Edelman with:
Natalie Edelman United Kingdom
Leah Zilversmit Pao United States
Aparna Jain United States
Jyoti Khandekar India
Lisa M. Pollack United States
Mukesh Shukla India
Alemayehu Digssie Gebremariam Ethiopia
Rabbanie Tariq Wani India
Asmare Belete Ethiopia
Corey Morrison United States
Anna Parker relative to Natalie Edelman United Kingdom Natalie Edelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Natalie Edelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Parker. The network helps show where Anna Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Parker Line = papers co-authored together Anna Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2016110
2 201729
3 202021
4 201719
5 202017
6 201917
7 198914
8 201613
9 201611
10 20214
11 19994
12 20173
13 20112
14 20241
15 20221
16 20220
17 20000

About Anna Parker

Anna Parker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (2 papers), Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (110 citations), General Health Professions (87 citations), Virology (14 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (20 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (14 citations). Anna Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Story, Jo‐anne Hughson, Robyn Woodward‐Kron, John Hajek, Tuong Phan, Ute Knoch, Jai N. Darvall, Kate Leslie, Wally Smith and Greg Wadley. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, BMJ Open, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Anatolian Studies and Colorectal Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact