Philip Smart
Impact in
-
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
-
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John D. Griffiths (2 shared papers)Sanjay Sastry (1 shared paper)K.I. Deen (1 shared paper)Alexander G. Heriot (11 shared papers)Stephen Stuckey (1 shared paper)Robert J. Postlethwaite (1 shared paper)Satish K. Warrier (8 shared papers)Javed Iqbal (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ANZ Journal of Surgery (6 papers)Colorectal Disease (3 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)Techniques in Coloproctology (2 papers)Gut (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Smart
45 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Oncology 126
- Nephrology 32
- Surgery 179
- Internal Medicine 14
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 54
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Smart
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Smart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Smart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Smart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Smart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Smart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Smart. The network helps show where Philip Smart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Smart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 37 | |
| 2 | 1963 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 29 | |
| 4 | Prospective evaluation of sutured, continuous, and interrupted single layer colonic anastomoses. | 1995 | 18 |
| 5 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1966 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | The Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Report 2019 | 2019 | 6 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5 |
About Philip Smart
Philip Smart is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (16 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (4 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (4 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (126 citations), Nephrology (32 citations), Surgery (179 citations), Internal Medicine (14 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (54 citations). Philip Smart has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John D. Griffiths, Sanjay Sastry, K.I. Deen, Alexander G. Heriot, Stephen Stuckey, Robert J. Postlethwaite, Satish K. Warrier, Javed Iqbal, Malcolm Lewis and Nathan Lawrentschuk. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Colorectal Disease, British journal of surgery, Techniques in Coloproctology and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.