Anna Moles

69 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Anna Moles
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 460
  • Developmental Biology 200
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 347
  • Biological Psychiatry 123
Replace Antonio M. Persico with:
Antonio M. Persico Italy
Jason R. Yee United States
Alan I. Leshner United States
Leonie Welberg United States
A. Courtney DeVries United States
Annaliese K. Beery United States
Steve W. C. Chang United States
Roger A. Kroes United States
Rose-Marie Bluthé France
Brian J. Prendergast United States
Anna Moles relative to Antonio M. Persico Italy Antonio M. Persico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Antonio M. Persico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Moles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Moles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Moles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Moles. The network helps show where Anna Moles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Moles Line = papers co-authored together Anna Moles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004348
2 2000187
3 2005154
4
Definitions of 'healthy' eating: a pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health.
1997131
5
Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating.
1997128
6 2007125
7 2012119
8 2010118
9 2013116
10 2010100
11 200684
12 200683
13 201482
14 200477
15 201175
16 200166
17 200065
18 199664
19 200863
20 200159

About Anna Moles

Anna Moles is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (25 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (19 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (12 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (460 citations), Developmental Biology (200 citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (347 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (123 citations). Anna Moles has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francesca R. D’Amato, Roberto Coccurello, Brigitte L. Kieffer, Alfonso Troisi, Claudio Zanettini, Anna Saba, Lotte Holm, Roberto Rizzi, Alessandro Bartolomucci and Laura Ricceri. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Animal Behaviour, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Physiology & Behavior and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact