Anna Moles

69 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Anna Moles
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 453
  • Developmental Biology 226
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Pharmacy 235
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 331
Replace Jason R. Yee with:
Jason R. Yee United States
A. Courtney DeVries United States
Antonio M. Persico Italy
Leonie Welberg United States
Steve W. C. Chang United States
Miranda M. Lim United States
Annaliese K. Beery United States
David M. Lyons United States
Francesca R. D’Amato Italy
Alessandro Bartolomucci United States
Anna Moles relative to Jason R. Yee United States Jason R. Yee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Jason R. Yee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Moles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Moles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Moles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Moles. The network helps show where Anna Moles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Moles Line = papers co-authored together Anna Moles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004376
2 2000195
3 2005170
4
Definitions of 'healthy' eating: a pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health.
1997142
5 2007139
6
Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating.
1997134
7 2013124
8 2012121
9 2010119
10 2010103
11 200691
12 201488
13 200687
14 200482
15 201180
16 200074
17 200172
18 199667
19 200867
20 200167

About Anna Moles

Anna Moles is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 69 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (23 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (18 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (453 citations), Developmental Biology (226 citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Pharmacy (235 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (331 citations). Anna Moles has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francesca R. D’Amato, Roberto Coccurello, Brigitte L. Kieffer, Alfonso Troisi, Claudio Zanettini, Anna Saba, Lotte Holm, Roberto Rizzi, Alessandro Bartolomucci and Laura Ricceri. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, Physiology & Behavior, PLoS ONE, Psychoneuroendocrinology and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact