Anna Meyer‐Weitz

2.0k citations
76 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Meyer‐Weitz

74 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anna Meyer‐Weitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • General Health Professions 682
  • Clinical Psychology 322
  • Infectious Diseases 284
  • Safety Research 127
  • Health 120
Replace Richard Dunville with:
Richard Dunville United States
Dianne Morrison‐Beedy United States
Loretta Gavin United States
Bradley O. Boekeloo United States
Christine Galavotti United States
Mary A. Ott United States
Chaohua Lou China
Devon J. Hensel United States
Kathryn Kost United States
H.W. van den Borne Netherlands
Anna Meyer‐Weitz relative to Richard Dunville United States Richard Dunville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Dunville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Meyer‐Weitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Meyer‐Weitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Meyer‐Weitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Meyer‐Weitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Meyer‐Weitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Meyer‐Weitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Meyer‐Weitz. The network helps show where Anna Meyer‐Weitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Meyer‐Weitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Meyer‐Weitz Line = papers co-authored together Anna Meyer‐Weitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201594
2 201990
3 201465
4 201660
5
Smoking status, knowledge of health effects and attitudes towards tobacco control in South Africa.
199656
6 201654
7 200053
8 201649
9 201148
10 199847
11 200842
12 201941
13 201341
14 201433
15 200533
16 202030
17 200027
18 200025
19 201524
20 201723

About Anna Meyer‐Weitz

Anna Meyer‐Weitz is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (24 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (12 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (11 papers), Sex work and related issues (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (8 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (7 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (682 citations), Clinical Psychology (322 citations), Infectious Diseases (284 citations), Safety Research (127 citations) and Health (120 citations). Anna Meyer‐Weitz has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Ghana and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kwaku Oppong Asante, Inge Petersen, Nuworza Kugbey, Priscilla Reddy, Richard G. Cowden, Gerjo Kok, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Bart van den Borne, H.W. van den Borne and Kaymarlin Govender. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of STD & AIDS, AIDS Care, Frontiers in Public Health, Journal of Adolescence and Vaccines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact