Anna M. McDaniel

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Anna M. McDaniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Research and Theory 192
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 45
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 45
  • Leadership and Management 29
  • General Health Professions 489
Replace Jacqueline Randle with:
Jacqueline Randle United Kingdom
Omar Al Rawajfah Jordan
Daniela Tartaglini Italy
Kelley Kilpatrick Canada
Jean Ker United Kingdom
Ferruccio Pelone United Kingdom
Giancarlo Cicolini Italy
Jennie C. De Gagné United States
Mohammed ALBashtawy Jordan
Maher M. El‐Masri Canada
Anna M. McDaniel relative to Jacqueline Randle United Kingdom Jacqueline Randle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jacqueline Randle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. McDaniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. McDaniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. McDaniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. McDaniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. McDaniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. McDaniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. McDaniel. The network helps show where Anna M. McDaniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. McDaniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. McDaniel Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. McDaniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000146
2 2003145
3 2009127
4 2010107
5 2001105
6 200874
7 200969
8 201163
9 201250
10 200741
11 200740
12 201437
13 201037
14 198729
15 201729
16 200527
17 200424
18 201222
19 202022
20 200821

About Anna M. McDaniel

Anna M. McDaniel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health Information Management, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (14 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (8 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (7 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (192 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (45 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (45 citations), Leadership and Management (29 citations) and General Health Professions (489 citations). Anna M. McDaniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Ebright, Maria R. Shirey, Carol Shieh, Mary L. Fisher, Rose M. Mays, Jennifer Yu, Bradley N. Doebbeling, Constance M. Baker, Joko Gunawan and Yupin Aungsuroch. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Nurse Specialist, Nursing Outlook, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Professional Nursing and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact