Anna Löfmark
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 0.1%
- Nursing education and management
- Leadership and Management top 1%
- Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Papers in
-
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 15
- Nursing Roles and Practices 6
- Health Sciences Research and Education 5
-
- Nursing education and management 18
- Co-authors
- Karin Wikblad (5 shared papers)Gunilla Mårtensson (9 shared papers)Maj‐Britt Råholm (10 shared papers)Ingrid Thorell‐Ekstrand (6 shared papers)Gerd Ahlström (4 shared papers)Åshild Slettebø (10 shared papers)Bibbi Smide (1 shared paper)Anna‐Greta Mamhidir (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Anna Löfmark
49 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Research and Theory 476
- Leadership and Management 63
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 43
- Family Practice 37
- General Health Professions 443
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Löfmark
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Löfmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Löfmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Löfmark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Löfmark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Löfmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Löfmark. The network helps show where Anna Löfmark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Löfmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 114 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 86 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 24 |
About Anna Löfmark
Anna Löfmark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (18 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (4 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (476 citations), Leadership and Management (63 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (43 citations), Family Practice (37 citations) and General Health Professions (443 citations). Anna Löfmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Karin Wikblad, Gunilla Mårtensson, Maj‐Britt Råholm, Ingrid Thorell‐Ekstrand, Gerd Ahlström, Åshild Slettebø, Bibbi Smide, Anna‐Greta Mamhidir, Marléne Lindblad and Gerd Karin Natvig. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education in Practice, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Interprofessional Care and BMC Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.